Reporting and Content Removal
Version: 1.0
Effective date: 31 October 2026
Language: English
1. Ordinary reports: how to submit
You may report a public model using the form associated with it, without creating an account. For copyright, personal-data or security matters, you may also write to Riccardo Consolandi: riccardo.consolandi.eng@gmail.com. The form is associated with available public models; the general contact remains the reference for cases not covered by the interface.
The form uses a technical session and request protections. “Without an account” does not mean anonymity in relation to networks and hosting. For data processing, consult the Privacy Policy.
2. Ordinary reports and legal notices are separate
Ordinary report. It may be submitted without an account or contact details. It brings technical problems, misleading descriptions, violations of admission rules or other content requiring assessment to the operator's attention. The form is a community process: merely selecting the “unlawful content” category does not provide all the elements of a legal notice.
Communications relating to allegedly unlawful content. You may send precise, reasoned information to the general contact in section 1, including:
- an explanation of why the content is considered unlawful;
- its precise electronic location, such as the model-entry or file URL, and further elements necessary to identify the content;
- the name and email address of the reporting person or entity, where required, subject to exceptions provided by law;
- a statement of the good-faith belief that the information and allegations are accurate and complete.
The general contact is separate from the community form and its numerical receipt. The form does not provide an electronic acknowledgement dedicated to a legal notice or a monitoring area for reporters without an account. The channel's name does not, by itself, determine a communication's legal effects: information actually received is assessed according to its content and applicable obligations. Using the general contact does not limit rights to acknowledgement of receipt, notification of the decision and information on remedies where provided by law.
3. Problems you may report
- Copyright or other intellectual property rights.
- Unauthorised redistribution or disputed provenance.
- Software captures excluded by the Sharing Policy.
- Unlawful content.
- Malicious files or security problems.
- Irrelevant or unauthorised personal data.
- Misleading descriptions or attribution.
- Other relevant problems, to be described.
The selected category does not, by itself, prove that a violation exists. A Library admission rule is separate from the permissions granted by a content item's external licence.
4. Useful information and confidentiality
Identify the model and describe the problem, disputed part and why you believe intervention is necessary in concrete terms. You may add available references, links or relevant elements; the server does not automatically open evidence links. Details are required in the ordinary form, while email contact and additional evidence are optional. For a legal notice, the requirements are those in section 2, without indiscriminately extending identification requirements to ordinary reports.
For rights disputes, explain your relationship with the material or rights holder and provide references useful for understanding them. Do not send identity documents, passwords, tokens, entire private archives or unnecessary third-party data. Proportionate clarification may be requested for the specific case.
Without contact details or a linked account it may not be possible to seek clarification or reply individually. The contact entered is not automatically associated with an account. Reports and reporter data are not published in the catalogue: they are handled by administration and made accessible only to the extent necessary or legally required, without promising absolute confidentiality in every proceeding.
5. Receipt and assessment
The ordinary form returns a report reference. Keep it: it confirms receipt, not a finding of a violation or a promise to remove the model. There is no public report register or automatic monitoring area for every reporter without an account.
The process distinguishes receipt, assessment and decision. The operator may retain or remove the content, or temporarily restrict its visibility and downloads during a specific investigation. Reporting does not automatically trigger removal. Relevant security or rights-protection reasons may require a restriction before the ordinary process concludes.
Notices of allegedly unlawful content are handled and decided in a timely, diligent, non-arbitrary and objective manner. If automated means are used to process the notice or reach a decision, that use is indicated in the relevant communication.
Assessment takes available information into account and may require further investigation. No universal response time is promised; obligations provided by law continue to apply. A signature, attestation or previous approval does not, by itself, resolve a rights dispute.
6. Communications and review
Decisions are recorded with references and reasons. The recipient has access to information in their own account process where provided; private notes and reporter contact details do not automatically become part of public communications.
Where the operator restricts or removes content, suspends or terminates the service or account for alleged unlawfulness of content or incompatibility with the Terms, the affected recipient is entitled to a clear and specific statement of reasons, in the cases and within the times provided by applicable law and where the relevant electronic contact is known. The communication indicates the measure and its scope and, where relevant, duration, the main facts and reasons for the decision, whether it derives from a legal provision or a service rule, any use of automated tools and applicable remedies. A statement of reasons is not exhausted by an internal reason code.
The reporter's identity is not disclosed automatically. Any identifying information is communicated only where necessary to understand the alleged unlawfulness or otherwise required, respecting applicable law and data minimisation. Private notes do not thereby become a public register.
The ordinary review process for rejections, removals and suspensions available to the recipient is described in the Moderation/Review Policy. The internal V1 procedure ordinarily provides 30 days from explicit acknowledgement of receipt in the personal area, subject to any longer period mandatorily required by applicable law; a suspended account has restricted access to its own suspension and review. A queued email does not demonstrate delivery or start that period. For legal notices with an electronic contact, the relevant obligations of acknowledgement, decision and information on remedies remain separate: they are not replaced by the absence of an account or by the voluntary 30-day procedure alone.
A reporter without an account does not automatically receive private access to review or case status. To challenge an outcome or provide new elements, they may use the general contact with the available reference. This channel is not presented as an equivalent automated procedure and does not limit mandatory remedies or recourse to competent authorities.
7. Removal and retention
Removal stops new Library downloads, but does not recall files already downloaded or automatically revoke a valid content licence. Temporary restriction and permanent data deletion are different operations.
Reports and decision history follow the retention categories in the Privacy Policy: ordinarily three years from report closure or the relevant final decision, while removed files and evidence have their own periods, normally up to 180 days unless documented reasons apply. The entire file is not automatically retained for the whole duration of the case. Exceptions require a relevant, documented reason and restricted access.
8. Proper use of reports
Submit accurate, relevant information. A rejected or disputed report is not, by itself, abuse. Manifestly malicious, repeated requests or requests aimed at bypassing protections may be assessed in context and subject to proportionate measures. There is no automatic penalty after three reports or three violations.
The general rules are in the Terms, Sharing Policy and Moderation/Review Policy.
Open the model report form
No PNAM account is required. The Library must be enabled and the model publicly available.